Ethics in historical research: Difference between revisions

From British Army Nurses
(Created page with "Context Although the subject matter and sources for historical research differ from that of mainstream health and social care research, there is still a requirement for historians to behave ethically and to follow a recognised code of practice (for example: American Association for State and Local History (AASLH), 2012). icon.png Presentation by Keiron The Vimeo video stream should be clever enough to detect the type of video stream you need for your device. If you do h...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Context
__NOTOC__
Although the subject matter and sources for historical research differ from that of mainstream health and social care research, there is still a requirement for historians to behave ethically and to follow a recognised code of practice (for example: American Association for State and Local History (AASLH), 2012).
==Context==
Although the subject matter and sources for historical research differ from that of mainstream health and social care research, there is still a requirement for historians to behave ethically and to follow a recognised code of practice, for example: American Association for State and Local History (AASLH), 2012<ref>American Association for State and Local History (AASLH) (2012) Statement of Professional Standards and Ethics Download Statement of Professional Standards and Ethics. Nashville: AASLH</ref>.


icon.png Presentation by Keiron
==Presentation==
The Vimeo video stream should be clever enough to detect the type of video stream you need for your device. If you do have difficulties with watching the video please leave us a message on the General Discussions board.
This is a video from the Massive Open Online Course "Researching British Army Nurses" and it makes reference to the course and the participants, so do not be confused by that! The Vimeo video stream should be clever enough to detect the type of video stream you need for your device. If you do have difficulties with watching the video please contact me.


[[File:Ethics in historical research (720p).mp4|640px|center]]


 
==Practical example of ethics in historical research==
The transcript of this presentation can be downloaded here Download here.
 
icon.png Practical example of ethics in historical research
This article concerned a lady identified as Mary Rutherford Ives and was sent in to Keiron by a family historian asking for the report to be verified:
This article concerned a lady identified as Mary Rutherford Ives and was sent in to Keiron by a family historian asking for the report to be verified:


MollyIves_deathnotice_1933_tidied.png
[[File:MollyIves deathnotice 1933 tidied.png|center]]


There were many irregularities in this report:


There were many irregularities in this report:
* No nurse has ever been awarded the Victoria Cross;
* The Victoria Cross was never awarded for general service and only for very specific acts of bravery in the face of the enemy;
* Mary Rutherford could not be identified on any data source related to the Boer War, although this in itself did not preclude her service;
* Mary Rutherford was not known as one of the Nightingale nurses who went to South Africa and they were well documented;
* If she had volunteered for service at the start of the war she could not have gone to the Transvaal, which at that point was a Boer Republic (unless she was a volunteer for the medical support to the Boers for which she would not have got recognition from Britain);
* Few nurses stayed four years in South Africa. The war lasted three years and those that stayed were those who joined the QAIMNS or who were retained for Government service.
* If she was awarded anything on her return after four years it would have been by the King as Queen Victoria had died by then.


No nurse has ever been awarded the Victoria Cross;
Like many family histories, their's was based on snippets of information and this newspaper report. What should I have told the family that asked for my help?  
The Victoria Cross was never awarded for general service and only for very specific acts of bravery in the face of the enemy;
Mary Rutherford could not be identified on any data source related to the Boer War, although this in itself did not preclude her service;
Mary Rutherford was not known as one of the Nightingale nurses who went to South Africa and they were well documented;
If she had volunteered for service at the start of the war she could not have gone to the Transvaal, which at that point was a Boer Republic (unless she was a volunteer for the medical support to the Boers for which she would not have got recognition from Britain);
Few nurses stayed four years in South Africa. The war lasted three years and those that stayed were those who joined the QAIMNS or who were retained for Government service.
If she was awarded anything on her return after four years it would have been by the King as Queen Victoria had died by then.
Like many family histories, their's was based on snippets of information and this newspaper report. What should I tell the family that asked for my help? Please post your answers in the Week 2: What should we say? discussion board.


icon.png References and Reading
==References==
American Association for State and Local History (AASLH) (2012) Statement of Professional Standards and Ethics Download Statement of Professional Standards and Ethics. Nashville: AASLH
<references />

Latest revision as of 10:50, 26 September 2024

Context

Although the subject matter and sources for historical research differ from that of mainstream health and social care research, there is still a requirement for historians to behave ethically and to follow a recognised code of practice, for example: American Association for State and Local History (AASLH), 2012[1].

Presentation

This is a video from the Massive Open Online Course "Researching British Army Nurses" and it makes reference to the course and the participants, so do not be confused by that! The Vimeo video stream should be clever enough to detect the type of video stream you need for your device. If you do have difficulties with watching the video please contact me.

Load video
Local File

Practical example of ethics in historical research

This article concerned a lady identified as Mary Rutherford Ives and was sent in to Keiron by a family historian asking for the report to be verified:

MollyIves deathnotice 1933 tidied.png

There were many irregularities in this report:

  • No nurse has ever been awarded the Victoria Cross;
  • The Victoria Cross was never awarded for general service and only for very specific acts of bravery in the face of the enemy;
  • Mary Rutherford could not be identified on any data source related to the Boer War, although this in itself did not preclude her service;
  • Mary Rutherford was not known as one of the Nightingale nurses who went to South Africa and they were well documented;
  • If she had volunteered for service at the start of the war she could not have gone to the Transvaal, which at that point was a Boer Republic (unless she was a volunteer for the medical support to the Boers for which she would not have got recognition from Britain);
  • Few nurses stayed four years in South Africa. The war lasted three years and those that stayed were those who joined the QAIMNS or who were retained for Government service.
  • If she was awarded anything on her return after four years it would have been by the King as Queen Victoria had died by then.

Like many family histories, their's was based on snippets of information and this newspaper report. What should I have told the family that asked for my help?

References

  1. ↑ American Association for State and Local History (AASLH) (2012) Statement of Professional Standards and Ethics Download Statement of Professional Standards and Ethics. Nashville: AASLH
Retrieved from "https://britisharmynurses.com/wiki/index.php?title=Ethics_in_historical_research&oldid=419"